It would be pleasant to say that this article is designed to remedy all this. And, of course, newcomers to the field have not been presented with any kind of comprehensive glossary.
Unfortunately, its contents have rarely been formally defined, and sometimes, inevitably, ambiguities and variations of meaning have developed. If we are going to discuss role-playing games with any kind of rigour, we are going to need to define our terms.Įver since (formalised) role-playing first took off, players and GMs have been developing a fairly extensive specialised vocabulary, and this has often been terse, expressive, and descriptive. Note this article first appeared in issue 2 of the late and greatly lamented periodical Interactive Fantasy. On The Vocabulary of Role-Playing Notes Towards Critical Consistency? by Phil Masters
0 kommentar(er)
